First because, people!!!! we're voting for the world's seven wonders now! as if they're politicians or beauty queens (why only seven, by the way?) and we're doing it online!!
And because it's such a fascinating power play! who gets to define what a "wonder" is? (well, the website has a feature where you can recommend a place or building to be included in the roster of candidates, which seemingly democratizes the polling process. but not really.)
Consider: are all the countries represented? Are there more entries from first world countries than poor ones?
Oh, and take into account the fact that not everyone is hooked on to the world wide web, nor to a computer as a matter of fact. Third world? We are at a major, MAJOR disadvantage, guys. Hey, I want the Philippines' Chocolate Hills to have made it into the top 5 as the next guy, but who are we kidding? It's called the digital divide.
Are they "wonders" because they've survived several centuries and were left over by ancient civilizations? Are they "wonders" because they hold a record in a book? And why do you hold natural locations (there are canyons and rivers in the running) in the same category as man-made structures? And why are we voting for them anyway? quel est le point??
Take the Taj Mahal for example.
Such a lovely, romantic, breathtaking, magnificent structure. Yes, it made it to the top 7. And, you would initially say, it's a winner because it's a wonderful world icon. It's a testament to unconditional love. Dedicated to a dead Indian king's wife. A nice tourist spot. An architectural marvel. And yes, it takes great pictures like the rest of them.
It also doesn't hurt that this mausoleum was firmly campaigned for by its national government. India's vote-for-the-Taj-Majal campaign. It's that important.
which means that getting world renown (we call it "soft power") is soooo important in a world where there's an economic and political disparity among nations. Like, we may be poor, we may be starving, a lot of us may be illiterate, but at least we get brownie points for the Taj Mahal.
Which, by the way, wasn't constructed out of thin air, but by thousands and thousands of workers who had to toil, day and night, who had to die, from overwork and disease, who built this magnificent structure, who had their hands cut off after their work was done because the king allegedly didn't want them to ever copy this building EVER, by a nameless, faceless, oppressed labor force who never benefited from the fruits of their work.
Practical benefits: the company that launched the poll at new7wonders.com said half the proceeds from all the media hype and advertisements from the event will go to restoration and protection for these wonders. Hurray. Some of these wonders REALLY need saving, from ruin, from raiding, from environmental degradation, or worse. But wait. They NEVER declared how much profit they got from launching this event, among other fishy fishy things. (Danwei news, reporting. :D )
This baby got booted out of the old "Seven Wonders" list because it's rapidly falling into
And--hallooooo! I thought stuff like this (the matter of deciding the seven sacred locations/structures to be worshipped by the world for the rest of the foreseeable future) should be held by an inter-national, non-profit, transparent organization (I dunno like maybe, ummmm UNESCO??), not a private corporation. Initiated by a man. Named Bernard Weber. Surprise! UNESCO slammed the thing.
So you see, voters of the world? They sent you on a spin to think it's all for the good of humankind to elect the next seven wonders (usually in an out-of-context, apolitical way as if these wonders just fell out from the sky to be venerated instead of being presented in a real, historically relevant, socio-political manner), as if it's got the express intention to protect "world heritage" when in fact, it's a clever ruse for them to make shitloads of money. They were banking on your national pride too, those greedy bastards.
And I almost voted too. Till I asked myself what the whole point of this thing was. In French, too. Here is le point:
voir par cela, savez-le complètement, en demandant pourquoi, pourquoi, pourquoi? (see through it, know it fully, by asking why, why, why?)


